top of page
All Posts
First Memorandum to Congress: Guardrails on Employment of Military Judge Advocates
Summary: This memo raises two initial concerns following the removal of the Army and Air Force Judge Advocates General: (1) whether the new Army TJAG's continued service in an elected office violates Department of Defense regulations, and (2) whether using National Guard judge advocates as immigration judges is appropriate under the Posse Comitatus Act. It recommends strengthening TJAG independence, conducting congressional oversight, and reviewing domestic military deploymen
Former JAG Working Group
Jul 17, 20251 min read
Proposal: Judge Advocate General Independence Act of 2025
Summary: This legislative proposal outlines statutory changes to protect the independence, rank, and availability of the Judge Advocates General and military legal professionals. It recommends restoring three-star rank for TJAGs, imposing “good cause” removal protections, ensuring commanders have access to legal advice, and strengthening statutory guarantees preventing interference with JAG counsel. The proposal’s goal is to reinforce legal safeguards that support lawful, eff
Former JAG Working Group
Feb 21, 20251 min read
Statement on the Importance of the JAG Corps
Summary: This statement explains the role of the Judge Advocate General Corps in maintaining military discipline, ethical leadership, operational legality, and international credibility. It outlines the link between legal compliance and military effectiveness and warns that recent decisions affecting JAG independence may erode commanders’ access to legal advice. It recommends that future TJAG nominees affirm their commitment to lawful military operations and that commanders c
Former JAG Working Group
Feb 1, 20251 min read
bottom of page